Blog

2025 SkillsUSA National Web Design and Development Competition Recap

Steve Waddell • August 21, 2025

This summer, CTeLearning was proud to once again contribute to the 2025 SkillsUSA National Leadership & Skills Conference in Atlanta, GA at the Georgia World Congress Center from June 23-27. Our professional association partner Web Professionals Global ran the Web Design and Development competition for the 22nd year in a row, providing students from a number of states with the opportunity to participate.


Our founder and lead developer, Steve Waddell, has been helping to run SkillsUSA competitions since 2005. Additionally, this past spring, CTeLearning and Web Professionals Global helped to facilitate the SkillsUSA Web Design and Development state competitions, the winners of which were invited to the national competition. Let’s hear a recap from Mark Dubois, Executive Director of Web Professionals Global, who spent the week in Atlanta. 


Week Recap

June 23 (Monday) -  After arriving late Sunday night, Mark arrived at the registration desk very early in the morning. He met our colleague Tammy Finch (Web services, Inc). Once Mark checked in for the event and received the packets of information and badges, he and Tammy were off to Courtesy Corps to arrange for their assistance in setting up the competition area. Mark had previously requested their help and needed to confirm all details once on site. He also worked with SkillsUSA personnel to get the wifi router installed and configured. Shortly after noon, both he and Tammy participated in the Technical Chair meeting. This event is held just prior to the competition to communicate last minute information (such as the current dispatch phone number and emergency procedures in the event of severe weather or other disruptions). Mark also picked up a plaque honoring our long time co-chair, Steve Waddell, for his numerous years of service to this competition.


Once the meeting concluded, both Mark and Tammy returned to the competition area to verify the wifi was working. Although there was no easy way to stress test the environment, all appeared to be working once the router received a software update. Many thanks to SkillsUSA for their help in getting this set up and working.


June 24 (Tuesday) -
  We began the day once again testing the network and confirming all was working for the competition. At noon, we held a written test for competitors in room B-311. This was the room we also used for competition debriefing and training during the week. The test covered various aspects of web design and development including fundamentals every competitor should know as well as a few more advanced questions. When completed, competitors had a moment to grab some lunch prior to our mandatory training session (which started at 2 p.m.).


We covered the use of our online coding environment as part of our training and explained how the competition would be run along with providing a written overview. We also provided links to videos explaining the coding environment. Mark also reviewed some potential pitfalls which could happen when using the environment. He also reviewed why it is important to preview your work in the browser periodically.


Once questions were addressed, Tammy and
David Jackson (Tekki Systems) [long time member of our on site technical team] provided an overview of what it is like to work in the industry today. After a brief discussion, they answered many questions from competitors. We hold these sessions concurrently for both the secondary (high school) and post-secondary (college) competitors. Each state was represented with a team of two competitors who had to work together to complete a series of specific tasks. More information about that can be found below (Wednesday). The session ran a bit over as there were many keen questions from those who aspire to work in our industry. 


Before we left the room, we reviewed the test scores of all competing teams and confirmed that their answers were properly recorded in our system. These scores are later input into a large spreadsheet for calculating the winners (gold, silver, and bronze) for both secondary and post-secondary competitions.


We mentioned to all competitors that we were throwing a wrinkle into the process this year. We have a practicing web professional who spent the same amount of time and used the same work order and assets to create a website. Since we are a global organization, we were able to ask someone from another time zone to do this. We decided that we would be reviewing their work as part of the competition debriefing. Everyone seemed intrigued by this new approach. They also got to meet this individual at the end of the training session (obviously via a Zoom meeting).


June 25 (Wednesday) -
  On this day we focused on the secondary teams. Roughly two dozen states were represented by teams of two. In order to compete in Atlanta, each team had to win first place in their respective state. We were honored to be able to work with many states in their respective state web design and development competitions. We provide the coding environment, assets, rubrics, and judging criteria. We ask each state to provide on-site personnel and judges.


Dan Dao
(our SkillsUSA .NET [National Education Team] member was able to join us again this year. This is his second year and we greatly appreciated his help. 


The competition began with a briefing and a client interview. In this case, David Jackson served in the role of client. He spent some time explaining what he needed as a client and was asked a number of questions by competitors about his business. Many of the questions were quite insightful and showed competitors wanted to understand his business to provide the best experience for his clients who would be visiting his website.


Once the client interview was finished, competitors returned to their workstations and spent about an hour drafting a low fidelity wireframe (some also did a site map and a few did a mood board/ stylesheet). We supplied the paper for use in this part of the process. Once they were finished with their version of the wireframe, they flagged down a team member who had them secure their work and the team was then handed a medium fidelity wireframe developed by a practicing professional. This is what each team used as they developed the website. We have used this approach for a number of years and it vastly helps with judging as all judges are examining and comparing similar work (for example, they expect mobile versions to display images in a certain spot that is different from the desktop version). Competitors worked as a team and had until 3 p.m. to complete their work and validate it was working properly in our online coding environment. While each team was working, they were called up for a team interview. In addition to addressing why their team should be considered for future work with clients, we also asked detailed questions about their individual wireframes. Those wireframes were left with the interviewers. At 3 p.m. the competition concluded and competitors were able to leave the venue.


Judges then began reviewing competitor work (each team had one submitted spot). We use our custom online tool as it has a judge view. In that view, judges can move from one team to another effortlessly. Judges are able to view the source code, validate it, and test in various mobile device settings. However, judges are not able to make any changes to the code itself (they are operating in a read only mode). We have been doing this for over 20 years (and a few of our judges have been with us for almost the entire time).


June 26 (Thursday) -
  The post-secondary teams competed on this day. We had roughly a dozen post-secondary teams. We have noted that there are often fewer post-secondary teams than secondary teams. This is part of the reason we have the high school teams compete on Wednesday as judges can spend Wednesday evening as well as most of the day Thursday evaluating the work of the secondary competitors.


As with the Wednesday competition, all teams met with the client and had the chance to ask many questions about his business. They then began to develop their own low fidelity wireframes. After an hour, they notified team members who secured their wireframes and provided competitors with a medium fidelity wireframe they could use to develop the website.


As before, the competition ended at 3 p.m. We then held a debriefing session in B-311. We reviewed the work of our volunteer web professional and showed his work in the judge's view (so competitors got a behind the scenes look similar to what judges use - although it was in a different but similar coding environment). We then opened the floor for questions and comments by the competitors. Mark took notes as these comments will be reviewed and incorporated into next year’s event. Those notes have been shared with all team members and we are starting to make modifications already.


Once the debriefing session concluded, a number of competitors accompanied us back to the competition venue as we had to dismantle the tables and chairs and stack all for the move out happening on Friday. Thanks to those who helped. You made a big difference.


We then returned to our respective hotel rooms. Mark reviewed the score sheets provided by judges for the secondary competition and entered those scores into the SkillsUSA judges data store while the work of the post-secondary teams was being evaluated. Judges got all completed and the final scores were all recorded before the 9 p.m. deadline set by SkillsUSA. They need the time to then develop the materials for the awards ceremony on Friday.


June 27 (Friday) -
  This was the first year that we knew when we would be handing out the awards (to the minute). We arrived at State Farm Arena and navigated our way backstage. Tammy and David placed the medals on the winning teams (gold, silver, and bronze) for both secondary and post-secondary teams. We went with the teams for official back state photos after the event. Congratulations to all who participated. Although there can only be one first place team in each event, you are all winners because you stepped up and tested your knowledge, skills, and abilities on a national stage. In a number of states, competitor teams had to win a regional competition, proceed to the state competition, and then on to the national competition (winning first in each to qualify for our competition in Atlanta). Well done and congratulations to all!


Get in Touch 

CTeLearning is proud of its work over the years with SkillsUSA. Reach out to us today for information on our collaboration with SkillsUSA and course offerings. 




Share To

Get in touch with us today!


You can book a demo directly using Calendly, call us directly at 913-764-4272 or 877-828-1216, or submit the form and we will reach out to you.


We look forward to helping you and your students.

students with STEM certifications

Most Recent Posts

By Steve Waddell November 14, 2025
Learn how we can help your school maximize the value of your current devices.
By Steve Waddell November 5, 2025
Here at CTeLearning, we keep up with trends in education and the workplace in order to better serve our schools. One recent trend is that the landscape of STEM education is undergoing a profound transformation. High school students who once aspired to traditional computer science careers are now exploring interdisciplinary fields that blend coding with data analysis, ethical interpretation, and creative problem-solving. This shift reflects a broader understanding: artificial intelligence isn't replacing human creativity and critical thinking—it's amplifying them. Let’s take a look at what this means. The Changing Face of STEM Education Research shows that AI is fundamentally reshaping how students approach STEM subjects. Rather than focusing solely on programming skills, today's students are learning to integrate machine learning into traditional disciplines like biology, physics, and design. They're using AI tools to model climate change, analyze genetic data, and solve real-world problems that require both computational skills and scientific inquiry. This evolution represents more than just adding new courses to the curriculum—it's about fundamentally changing how students think about innovation and problem-solving. Educators across the country report that teenagers are increasingly drawn to AI's potential, but they need guidance to understand how to use these tools effectively and ethically. The challenge isn't whether to integrate AI into education; it's how to do so in a way that enhances rather than diminishes core learning objectives. What's particularly striking about this shift is the recognition that AI skills are becoming essential across all career pathways, not just in technology fields. By 2027, 75% of businesses are anticipated to use AI technologies, and company leaders increasingly value AI capabilities in prospective employees. Perhaps most telling: 60% of companies report they would hire a less experienced candidate with basic AI skills over a more experienced individual without them. These statistics underscore a critical reality—students who understand how to work alongside AI will have a significant competitive advantage in virtually any career they choose. The Importance of Process Over Product At CTeLearning, we've always believed that understanding the process is more important than simply producing a final product. This philosophy has guided our curriculum development for over two decades, and it's never been more relevant than in the age of AI. In our Web Design course, for example, students don't just learn to code websites—they learn to think like designers and developers. They master color theory, site aesthetics, wireframing, and testing. They learn how to engage with clients, collaborate with team members, communicate effectively, and deliver projects on time and on budget. These process-oriented skills are what separate proficient web designers from those who can only follow tutorials. This emphasis on process becomes even more critical when AI tools enter the picture. AI can generate code, suggest design layouts, and automate repetitive tasks. But it cannot understand a client's brand story, navigate the nuances of user experience design, or make the creative decisions that transform a functional website into an engaging digital experience. Students who understand the design process can leverage AI to enhance their work while maintaining creative control and professional standards. Our approach to teaching web design mirrors the real-world creative process that professionals use daily. Students learn to: Research and understand requirements before jumping into design Develop concepts and style tiles that communicate visual direction Create wireframes that establish structure and user flow Build iteratively with opportunities for feedback and revision Test and refine their work based on user experience principles Present and explain their design decisions professionally When students internalize this process, they develop problem-solving frameworks that transcend specific tools or technologies. Whether they're working with HTML and CSS today, or with AI-assisted design tools tomorrow, they understand how to approach creative challenges systematically and thoughtfully. Creativity as a Core Competency Our courses are designed around a fundamental principle: creativity is not just an artistic skill—it's a professional competency that can be taught, practiced, and refined. In our Web Design curriculum, students engage in project-based learning that encourages creative expression while building technical proficiency. The creative process we emphasize involves: Experimentation and Iteration : Students learn that great design rarely happens on the first attempt. Our curriculum builds in time for experimentation, revision, and refinement. The coding sandbox feature allows students to practice new concepts immediately, encouraging them to try different approaches and learn from both successes and failures. Critical Assessment : We teach students to critically evaluate their own work and the work of others. This skill helps them understand what makes design effective, identify areas for improvement, and articulate the reasoning behind their creative decisions. Unique Voice Development : While students learn industry standards and best practices, we also encourage them to develop their own creative voice. The projects in our courses allow for personal expression within professional frameworks, helping students build portfolios that showcase both technical competence and creative vision. This focus on creativity serves students well in an AI-enhanced workplace. AI tools can suggest solutions, but they require human creativity to frame problems effectively, evaluate options critically, and make decisions that align with project goals and user needs. Students who develop strong creative thinking skills become AI users who guide technology toward meaningful outcomes, rather than passive consumers who accept whatever AI generates. AI for the Workplace Understanding the growing importance of AI literacy across all career pathways, we developed the AI for the Workplace course to equip students with practical AI skills they can apply regardless of their future educational or professional direction. This course takes a fundamentally different approach from many AI education initiatives—rather than focusing on how to build AI systems, we teach students how to work effectively with AI as a professional tool. The course is built around several core principles: AI as an Enhancement, Not a Replacement : We explicitly teach students that AI is a tool to enhance their capabilities, not replace their thinking. Just as calculators didn't eliminate the need to understand mathematics, AI tools don't eliminate the need for critical thinking, creativity, and professional judgment. Students learn to use AI to streamline work, generate ideas, and tackle complex problems more efficiently—while maintaining ownership of their decisions and outputs. Practical, Cross-Industry Application : The course features our PromptScout tool, which provides students with over 5,000 example prompts from 63 different industries and job categories. This exposure helps students understand that AI isn't just for programmers or data scientists—it's increasingly relevant for welders, dental hygienists, marketing professionals, educators, and countless other careers. By exploring AI applications across diverse fields, students can envision how these tools might support their own career interests. Ethical and Responsible Use : We emphasize that working with AI requires understanding its limitations, biases, and ethical implications. Students learn to evaluate AI outputs critically, recognize when AI might produce misleading or inappropriate results, and understand their responsibility as AI users. This includes discussions about plagiarism, intellectual property, data privacy, and the importance of transparency about AI use in professional settings. Real-World Scenarios : Rather than abstract concepts, the course presents students with authentic workplace scenarios where AI can provide value. Students practice using AI for research, content creation, problem-solving, and decision support. They learn to write effective prompts, evaluate results critically, and integrate AI insights into their work appropriately. Why AI Isn't a Threat—It's an Opportunity There's considerable anxiety in education about AI potentially replacing jobs or enabling students to bypass genuine learning. We understand these concerns, but we believe they reflect a misunderstanding of how AI functions and how education should respond. AI excels at pattern recognition, data processing, and generating content based on existing information. But it lacks several distinctly human capabilities that remain essential in virtually every professional field: Contextual Understanding : AI can't fully grasp the nuanced context of specific situations, client relationships, or organizational cultures. It doesn't understand the unspoken requirements, the historical background, or the dynamics that often shape professional decisions. Creative Vision : While AI can generate variations on existing ideas, true creative innovation—the ability to envision something fundamentally new—remains a human strength. AI can support the creative process, but it can't originate creative vision.  Ethical Judgment : AI can identify options but can't make value-based decisions about what should be done in complex situations. Professional ethics, moral reasoning, and nuanced judgment remain human responsibilities. Relationship Building : Professional success often depends on trust, communication, and interpersonal skills that no AI can replicate. Understanding clients, collaborating with colleagues, and navigating organizational dynamics require emotional intelligence and social skills. Adaptive Problem-Solving : When faced with novel situations that don't match existing patterns, humans excel at adaptive thinking—drawing on diverse experiences, making creative connections, and inventing new approaches. Students who develop these human capabilities while learning to leverage AI as a tool will be exceptionally well-prepared for the future workplace. They'll be able to accomplish more, faster, and with higher quality than those who rely on human capability alone—or those who try to rely on AI without strong foundational skills. The CTeLearning Difference: Preparing Whole Professionals Our curriculum philosophy has always focused on preparing "whole professionals"—students who possess not just technical skills, but also the soft skills, ethical understanding, and professional mindset needed for career success. This holistic approach becomes even more valuable in an AI-enhanced workplace. In our courses, students learn: Technical proficiency in their chosen field, whether web design, animation, or game development Creative problem-solving through project-based learning and iterative design processes Professional communication through client engagement scenarios and collaborative projects Ethical reasoning regarding intellectual property, copyright, workplace ethics, and now AI use Self-directed learning skills that enable them to adapt as technologies evolve Critical thinking to evaluate their work, assess options, and make informed decisions When students complete our courses and earn industry-recognized certifications, they carry with them not just technical knowledge but a professional identity. They understand what it means to work as a designer, developer, or animator. They can speak the language of their chosen field, understand professional standards, and navigate workplace expectations. Adding AI literacy to this foundation creates students who are uniquely prepared for the evolving workplace. They possess the technical skills employers need, the creative capabilities that AI cannot replicate, and the understanding of how to leverage AI tools to enhance their professional effectiveness. Looking Forward The integration of AI into education and the workplace will continue to accelerate. Rather than viewing this as a threat, we see it as an opportunity to emphasize what makes us distinctly human—our creativity, our ethical judgment, our ability to understand context, and our capacity for innovative thinking. At CTeLearning, we're committed to helping teachers prepare students for this future. Our courses provide the technical foundation, creative development, and now the AI literacy that students need to thrive. We believe in empowering students to understand and direct technology, not be directed by it. For teachers considering how to address AI in their classrooms, we encourage you to focus on these principles: Teach process alongside product : Help students understand how professionals think and work, not just what they produce Emphasize creativity and critical thinking : These human capabilities become more valuable, not less, in an AI-enhanced world Introduce AI as a tool : Frame AI as something students can learn to use effectively, not something to fear or rely upon uncritically Maintain high standards : AI shouldn't lower expectations; it should enable students to achieve more sophisticated results Address ethics explicitly : Help students understand their responsibilities as AI users in educational and professional contexts The future belongs to students who can blend human creativity with technological capability—who understand both the power and the limitations of AI, and who can apply professional judgment to decide when and how to leverage these tools. That's the kind of preparation CTeLearning provides, and it's what your students deserve. If you're interested in learning more about our Web Design course, AI for the Workplace course, or any of our other career and technical education offerings, schedule a free 20-minute demo with us. Let us show you how we can help you prepare your students for successful futures in an AI-enhanced world.
By Steve Waddell November 3, 2025
Landscape design and horticulture still offer bright future pathways for your students.